Tips for Scientific Presentations
Here are some tips that I think are useful.
It's a lot
to absorb, but that's because there is a lot to think about when
giving a talk. With practice,
much of this will become second nature.
-
Content.
- Be sure to hit the main points.
What these are will depend on your talk, but you want to think
about questions like:
What is the motivation for your subject?
What are the main assumptions/observational constraints?
What are the main theory input/results?
How well do theory and observation agree?
And be especially sure that your talk makes clear
how your subject fits into the material of this course.
That is, make clear the answer to:
How do your results
fit into the big picture of your field, and of astrophysics generally?
-
Hit the right level. This is a difficult art, and not
everyone would agree about what the right level is, though
clearly it depends on the audience.
The difficult but important balance to strike is that you don't
want to give extraneous detail, yet you don't want to
oversimplify to the point of having no content.
In thinking about this, ask yourself: what are the most important
results? Then ask: what are the key steps leading to these
results? Then ask: what is the clearest and simplest way to present
these key results.
- Give physical intution whenever possible.
Simple physical arguments are invaluable in helping people to understand
and remember the results you present.
Pictures/sketches can be very effective too.
-
Organization.
- Make sure your talk has a logical flow.
If you need point B to understand point A,
then say point B first.
- Carefully craft the structure of your talk.
I find it helpful to think of the "hourglass" model--i.e.,
moving your focus from broad to narrow then back to broad.
Namely: relate your question to the big picture of astrophysics,
then give the gist of how you actually go about answering your
question, then relate the answer back to the big picture and
tell us what new things we have now learned
(and any remaining open questions/predictions).
-
Presentation.
-
Speaking.
You want to speak clearly and loudly enough that people can easily
hear you. Look out at the audience whenever possible.
Don't speak in a monotone--use inflection in your voice to make
clear what points are important. Don't be afraid to pause,
or to say
"the following result is very important."
Also, practice the transitions between your slides.
This is often a source of trouble for people.
You want to make your links smoothly and without too much
wordiness.
-
Choreography.
While you are striving to make your message clear,
remember that you are opaque:
don't stand in the beam of the projector.
It is good to point to your slides, to help people follow,
but do use a pointer, and stand to the side, so that everyone
can see what you are pointing to.
-
Slides.
It is critical that your slides be neat
and legible.
Make sure the words and figures are big enough so that everyone, even those
in the back, can see them.
Practicing your talk provides an excellent opportunity to test this.
Be very thoughtful about how much you write.
I am a firm believer in the philosophy that
you want everyone in the audience to understand
every mark on your slides.
A corollary to this is that you should use great care
in showing other people's plots.
Often these have much more information that you need to convey your point.
If the data is readily available, the best thing is to
replot it, so you can present it exactly the way you want,
with the labels you want. The next best thing is to
make your own marks on the plot to help guide the viewer's eye;
for example, you can underline/highlight axis labels and perhaps
interpret them, as in "baryon density" or "abundance."
If there is more than one curve, you can highlight the ones
that are important.
I am also a firm believer in taking advantage of
the full range of the visible spectrum. Monochromatic
talks tend to be harder to follow, as color can help
you indicate what is imporant, as can underlining, or
"highlighting" in yellow (in which case you should recall
that a transparency has two sides you can write on).
Of course, this can be overdone; too many colors can
be distracting. I personally believe in two main colors
per transparency, with maybe one more if there's a need (e.g.,
for highlighting).
- Timing. It is exceedingly bad for a talk to run overtime;
this quickly annoys the audience.
Thus, you must be sure that
you can do your talk on time. Again, practice will help,
as will some forethought as to what you will cut if you
find you are running behind.
- Citations and Academic Integrity:
Your talks and papers are not required to be original
research, and thus all of what you say will
draw on your rest of references. You must acknowledge this
explicitly and clearly.
In particular, you must of course follow the
rules of
academic integrity,
which among other things states that
-
"Every direct quotation must be identified by quotation marks or by
appropriate indentation and must be promptly cited in a citation."
-
"Prompt acknowledgment is required when material from another source
is paraphrased or summarized in whole or in part. This is true even if
the student's words differ substantially from those of the source."
In a paper, it is clear how to do this (and if it is not, talk to
me!). However, in a talk--particularly a short one like this--it is
impractical and not useful to flash up a long, full bibliography
which nobody can read. Thus the nature of citations
becomes more difficult for a talk, but it is still your
responsibility to make clear what sources you used. Some things
you can and should
do:
-
Be sure to explicitly cite any direct quotation.
Typically, you will be listing bullet points which probably
are not even in complete sentences, so you probably
should not even be using direct quotes--but you must cite them
explicitly if you do.
-
As you mention key ideas, you can cite them in shorthand
by writing on your overheads the
names, and possibly years, of the key authors involved.
For example, if you are discussing neutrino counting in
big bang nucleosynthesis, you would write
"Steigman, Schramm, and Gunn 1977".
You need not necessarily say every citation out loud, but
have them there so that people can find them.
Similarly, to help the audience know what is a citation
and what is part of the text of your transparency, you
might choose to put the citations in smaller print
and/or in a different color than the main text.
-
When you present images, figures, tables, or diagrams, you
must make it absolutely clear where you got them
and/or the information
they contain. Even if you create your own figures
based on somebody else's data,
you must indicate where you got the data.
More tips:
-
Astronomy 134 is not quite Carnegie Hall, yet still:
practice, practice, practice!
In front of anyone who will listen (officemate, significant other,
pets, etc.). Bribe them if needed. You will be amazed (I always am)
at the difference between running through the talk in your
head and saying it out loud. For example, you are much more likely to
discover any holes in the logic or flow when talking
to someone who has not been thinking about the subject as long
as you have in the way you have.
-
Use equations sparingly.
It is often possible to give a whole talk using only a few
or one or even zero equations. If you must equate,
keep you notation as intuitive
and simple as possible.
-
Finally, I find it very helpful to become a "student of talks."
That is, when I am at talks (colloquia, seminars, conferences),
I pay attention to what works and doesn't work. If I like a talk,
or hate it, I ask myself what about the talk leads me to react this
way, and I try to learn from this.
Second Opinions
You will find that not everyone would agree with all of the advice above.
For other points of view, I commend you to the web:
Brian D. Fields
Last modified: Wed Sep 23 18:06:40 CDT 2009