The first chapter is a discussion of General Relativity. After some nice conceptual discussion, the rest of the presentation becomes a bit dense and probably is challenging for a neophyte to GR.
The third chapter is Peacock's opening discussion of cosmology, but comes after chapters on astrophysics and relativity. As such, it's rather direct, not a "chatty" or informal easing into the subject, and is focused on establishing the basic concepts and their mathematical description. For a broader review with a wider focus, see some of the supplemental readings.
This is a dates but very accessible and exuberant review which captures the spirit of excitement in cosmology. It is interesting to read in the light of what has and has not occurred since it was written.
This is a brief but conceptual review of some of the essentials of General Relativity. The authors consciously try to avoid mathematical detail and to appeal to key physical and geometrical principles.
The questions are really meant to help guide your thinking as you read. You may find it helpful to look at the questions first and bear them in mind as you read.
Post your answers on Compass. Your answers must be in your own words.
Distinguishing a big bang universe from a steady state universe. Posted on Compass; your reply will be visible to your classmates.
We'd like to know a little bit about you for our files. Briefly, what is your background, if any, in astronomy/astrophysics? In nuclear/particle physics? If you are already involved in research, what are you working on? If you are not, what area(s) interest you?
Are there specific topics would you like see discussed in this course?
For inspiration and a view of the big picture (as of 16 years ago), read the Turner article.
Take look at either the initial discussion in Chapter 1 of Peacock, and/or the Baez & Bunn article, and/or the very nice first paragraphs of Chapter 4 in Carroll, reading for concepts more than for the formalism. Clearly, this reading is not going to teach you General Relativity from scratch, but is only meant to give you a flavor of the philosophy and some of the results of this beautiful theory. To really understand GR, take Stu Shapiro's course!
Given these limited goals with respect to GR, the questions here are just to help you think about the basics.