In the context of writing-to-others,
a desired consequence and a thesis
are distinctly different.
Ideally, a desired consequence is a specific-and-observable outcome of a particular instance of writing.
A desired consequence statement can be used by a writer as a tool to (metaphorically) help:
- the writer keep focused on motivating the target audience (to acheive the desired consequence)
- the writer keep the writing on course (toward acheiving the desired consequence)
It is relatively easy to assess the effectiveness of ones writing when ones desired consequence is—
- a specific and observable EVENT (acheived through the agency of the target audience which performs a specific action).
A thesis statement is the writer's position in a particular text. So, a thesis statement—
- is not necessarily descriptive of a specific-and-observable event (to be acheived by the actions of the target audience)
As a writer's tool, a thesis statement:
- (metaphorically) presages the gist of an essay/article and
- (metaphorically) guides a reader into a text.
In the context of writing-to-others, using a thesis statement to help assess the effectiveness of ones writing is not recommended because a thesis statement:
- tends to (metaphorically) divert a writer's attention away from motivating the target audience (by focusing the writer's attention on her/his own actions—informing, showing, demonstrating, arguing, et cetera), and
- need not identify a specific-and-observable EVENT, the acheivement of which can be used as a measure of writing success.
|